Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

The Beauty Of Truth - by bruce potter

The Beauty Of Truth - July 2009

I hate supermarkets. I understand they are a necessary evil, and I do feel sorry for supermarket staff for the soulcrushing task it must be to have to work there, and also for the atrocious manner in which their customers behave. But if I could live this and the next life over and never visit a supermarket again, it would be too soon.
Couples should never go to the supermarket together. A life shared is hard enough in modern times, but taking on the task of doing the regular weekly shop and avoiding the myriad opportunities for conflict is too much to ask.
The aisles may be wider then ever, but they’re littered with the detritus and fallout from many “happy” couples shopping adventures.

First there’s the parking issue; most men park in the first spot they see. Most women like to be reasonably close to the supermarket/lift door. Why a person who spends eight hours a week at the gym, loses their freakin’ mind at having to push the trolley an extra thirty metres is beyond me, but there you go. My preferred parking spot is not in the car park at all – I park in the street. Maybe that’s why I’m single.
Then you have the woollworths/coles/franklins/a ldi issue. I try to use them all; be a grocery slut; show no loyalty at all. Make them work for my business. But most women will have a personal favourite, for entirely honest reasons. Most men will have a personal favourite – which ever one you can get out of the quickest.
Then comes the perishable/non-perishable debate. I absolutely understand that fresh food always tastes better and is better for you. But in this bankrupt age, many of us don’t have a choice. If it comes out of a box or can, it will cost half as much, last twice as long, and take half as long as to prepare as fresh food.

Then you have the individual choice issues; nobody has exactly the same diet as you. Expecting your partner to eat exactly what you do is a fool’s errand. Expecting a man to completely willingly change his diet for the rest of his life is a greater joke. (See previous “Men are not projects” post.)
So there has to be compromise; maybe you both like different flavours of fruit juice; you may like different breads; you may like different meats.
Finding middle ground here is always difficult. Find it as soon you can, as there’ve been too many political scandals over petty things. Meat-Gate; Fruit-Gate; Butter-Gate; Sauce-Gate, et al.
Then there’s sizeable dramas over smaller things – friends of mine had an argument over the way the items were placed on the conveyer belt and then packed into the trolley. Another couple used to battle over the way the groceries were packed away at home. So much heated discussion over something that is entirely unworthy of you and your partner’s energy.
I do believe that this pettiness is brought out by the supermarket. For some reason when you walk through that turnstyle, there’s a very good chance you’ll have an argument with your loved one over something you wouldn’t care about beyond those evil confines. Suddenly desecated coconut or wholemeal breadcrumbs or seafood cocktail sauce become like Bush’s WMD’s; something worth sacrificing human life for, despite clear evidence to the contrary.
My solution – An adult crèche at the supermarket. I’ve often thought with the tantrums being thrown by children in the supermarkets a crèche at the supermarket might be something parents would like. An extension of that would be an adult crèche; one for men and one for women.
The men’s would feature a big arse plasma (because to us plasmas are like penises – they can never really be big enough) with a playstation and a foxtel decoder with a platinum package. No bar but though; a bar would only result in the men leaving the crèche to hit on the checkout operators. Then you’ve got Checkout-Gate.
The women’s would have a coffee shop, bookshop, handicraft stall and a smaller plasma with a rotating DVD loop of Grease, Dirty Dancing, Pretty Woman and Mama Mia.
Each couple would take turns in their respective crèches, whilst the other one shopped, half-hour on/half-hour off and then they would go home.
Everyone’s happy.
Then you get home and find that four of the dozen eggs that the man was sure he checked, are broken.
Egg-Gate.
Oh well.

65
Vote
   


How do jockeys get dates? (3)

July 7th 2009 15:03
The only times I’ve ever felt remotely tall in my life were when I used to work at the horse races and had reason to walk through the jockeys room. Maybe that was what life was like for Shaquille O’Neal.

Imagine if you were picturing the ideal man; I’m not sure, but I tend to think that being four-feet-ten, having to diet like a crazy person, and having to be in bed by 8pm probably aren’t going to be qualities a woman would cherish.

But curiously, jockeys have no trouble at all getting dates.

I’m by no means knocking jockeys and their plight. Most of them leave school at 14, then shovel shit through their apprenticeship, then spend their adult life fighting their anatomy and its inevitable expansion. Some jockeys have one solid meal a month, the rest of the time its rice and pasta. They work six days a week, and have to get up at three in the morning.

That lifestyle alone would seem to make them less than attractive partners. But they seem to get by, better than most of us in some cases.

That makes the issue even more complex. If height were so important how can these guys measure up?

A darker thought is that while they have many drawbacks, they do have a very decent salary to compensate. An average jockey will make between $100,000 – 200,000; a good jockey will earn $500,000 and a top line hoop with a few key cup wins will make upwards of $3million a year.

But surely it can’t be that simple? Surely money can’t be the cure all for any of life’s average inadequacies? Surely a man is to be judged by the depth of his heart, not the width of his wallet? Surely it should be about the size of his character, not a character of his size?

Whatever the truth, it is a vexing one. Please illuminate me in how to unravel this vexation.
And maybe I will ask Lauren Jackson out again, as she is most definitely vexatious.

I can see the beauty all around, but where is the truth?









55
Vote
   


How do jockeys get dates? (2)

July 7th 2009 14:32
Now you’re awake...
I played basketball for twenty years and so asked for all the torment I suffered as a result-
The Angry Ant; The Grumpy Dwarf; Webster; Mini-me; Spud; Elmer and my favourite – the Oompah Loompah – these were all nick-names I wore on various basketball teams and in some work environments. I had no trouble with this, because being called a nickname is far better than having one that is only used behind your back.

But I took great exception when this kind of heightism impacted on my success, or lack thereof, in my online dating adventures. I was rejected many times without explanation, and it seemed that it was primarily because I wasn’t checking the woman’s height requirements. I tried only approaching girls that had no height restrictions, or were happy with 174cm of man, and I started to have some success. This led to some interesting dates, some hysterically so, but that’s a story for another day.

My point is that it seems that women value many virtues in a man, many more so than the average man does, and that’s fine. But why does he have to be taller than her?
It surely can’t be a case of those many virtues only existing in men six foot or taller.

I’ve known and know tall men, and I’ve known short men, and whilst I’ll never deal with them one-on-one in an emotional sense, the taller guys don’t necessarily stand out as being far more virtuous and therefore desirable for women. But to an almost absolute degree the tall men have more success than their shorter counterparts in attracting women.

It therefore follows that the slimiest men I’ve known, the ones you wouldn’t class as virtuous, are invariably taller than average. Maybe the issue isn’t with women’s standards, maybe it’s more about reflecting society in general. Maybe we all view bigger as better. . .

I’ve been rejected to my face because I wasn’t tall enough a few times, and that’s the last time I’ll ever ask Lauren Jackson out.

The curious thing is that it should be men who have the issues with height as we are generally much more superficial than women. As in, surely we would have a much greater issue with being seen with a woman who was taller than us? But I had two relatively successful relationships with girls that were taller than me, and I can’t ever remember thinking I wish she was shorter.

I know some guys have issues with only dating shorter women, but most guys seem to be okay with the woman being taller.
Tom Cruise is 5-8; Sylvester Stallone is 5-9; Mel Gibson is 5-9; Dustin Hoffman is 5-4; and Paul Newman was 5-7, so it seems that shortness is not necessarily a barrier to success on-screen.

But what about the jockeys?
47
Vote
   


How do jockeys get dates? (1)

July 7th 2009 13:06
Awake?
A question for the ladies – A good sense of humour; a steady career; a loving approach to children; a patient attitude with in-laws; a sense of culture and a lack of interest in binge drinking – are all qualities women search for in a man. With that being the case, how many of you have been out with men shorter than you? Surely at least six foot tall should be the first of your priorities, as it’s fairly difficult to train men to be tall.
Or is it


[ Click here to read more ]
41
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
3 Posts
1 Posts
82 Posts dating from March 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by bruce potter
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]